Home | Classifieds | Place an ad | Obituaries | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Real Estate Search | 928 Media Lab | Contact Us | Subscribe | Yellow Pages
Prescott Valley Tribune | Prescott Valley, Arizona

home : opinions : opinions August 28, 2014

6/5/2013 10:27:00 AM
Freedom to report news requires freedom to gather it
Gene Policinski
Inside the First Amendment

In the months ahead, that basic concept - so central to the First Amendment's protection of a free press - will also be at the heart of the ongoing debate over how far government officials may go in pursuit of those responsible for "leaking" classified information to journalists.

The debate kicked off new fervor with disclosure of a wide search conducted by the Department of Justice in which it seized phone records of The Associated Press that spanned two months, multiple offices and even some personal lines.

The clandestine nature of the seizure meant AP was not given the opportunity to argue for even a more-focused search on a specific leak - leaving the work of up to 100 journalists on multiple stories exposed to government scrutiny.

Then there was the outright label of criminal conduct, as a "co-conspirator and/or aider and abettor," attached by an FBI agent to James Rosen, chief Washington correspondent for Fox News. Justice Department officials apparently believe Rosen solicited confidential information from a U.S. State Department source about a 2009 pending North Korean missile launch.

In seeking a search warrant in 2010 to secretly examine Rosen's e-mails, the agent said the journalist's tactics included "employing flattery" and playing to the source's "vanity and ego." The source later was indicted, and reportedly the FBI riffled through Rosen's e-mails for at least 30 days, along with phone data and computer records of Rosen's trips in and out of the U.S. State Department buildings.

Mass collection of journalists' phone call information. Threats of "criminal liability" aimed at reporters who get information from confidential sources in the government. The idea that "flattery" equals espionage.

Combined with an unprecedented six prosecutions for alleged leaks - double the number under all previous administrations combined - it all adds up to a not-so-subtle message: "Don't ask, don't tell."

But asking official sources to tell what they know, on or off-the-record, is essential to the role of a free press as an independent source of information about the government's inner workings.

Conscientious whistleblowers in recent years have alerted fellow citizens to morally questionable interrogation tactics and potentially illegal wiretapping of phone conversations, and spurred publicly outcry over issues such as the Pentagon's failure to provide in a timely manner and in sufficient numbers, supplies of available, mine-resistant vehicles to U.S. troops in the Middle East.

The basic question of how a free press must function will again complicate a renewed push in Congress for a so-called shield law. In setting out when a journalist may choose not to tell the name of a confidential source, and perhaps when the government may not ask, the methods of newsgathering will be front and center.

Any such law also will have to address First Amendment concerns over becoming a back-door form of official "licensing" of who is entitled to the full rights of a free press.

The Associated Press' CEO Gary Pruitt, in his letter to the Department of Justice objecting to the records seizure, said that if the practice went unchallenged, the long-term result would be "the people of the United States will only know what the government wants them to know ... That's not what the framers of the Constitution had in mind when they wrote the First Amendment."

As some draw a connection between the AP and Rosen flaps to the Nixon anti-press era, it's also instructive as this national debate continues to consider the words in 1971 of U.S. District Judge Murray Gurfein.

In his first days as a federal judge in the Southern District of York, Gurfein rejected the initial government attempt to stop The New York Times from publishing the "Pentagon Papers." In his ruling, he said:

"The security of the Nation is not at the ramparts alone. Security also lies in the value of our free institutions. A cantankerous press, an obstinate press, an ubiquitous press, must be suffered by those in authority in order to preserve the even greater values of freedom of expression and the right of the people to know. These are troubled times. There is no greater safety valve for discontent and cynicism about the affairs of government than freedom of expression in any form."

True then. True now.

    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Code on dogs, limit on animals raises hackles (7 comments)
600 Bradshaw students dedicate ALS Ice Bucket Challenge to former student Gabe Reyes *with video* (2 comments)
Man calls to report assault, arrested on drug charges (1 comment)
Little League 9-10 Softball All Stars (1 comment)
Candidates are preparing the voters (5 comments)

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. The email and phone info you provide will not be visible to the public. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to 1300 characters or less. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Prescott Valley, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Find It Features Blogs Milestones Extras Submit Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place an ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Opinions | Real Estate Search | Contact Us | Subscribe | e-newsletter | RSS | Site Map
© Copyright 2014 Prescott Newspapers, Inc. The Prescott Valley Tribune is the information source for Prescott Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. Prescott Newspapers Online is a service of Prescott Newspapers, Inc. By using the Site, pvtrib.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Prescott Newspapers Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved